Blog

Your Team’s Not Agile Unless You’re Doing Agile Testing

For many software testing professionals experienced in traditional development processes, working in an Agile project can be a foreign concept. Testing in older development models often only takes place near the end of a major development phase by a team of dedicated testers. As a result, test phases can be seen as a bottleneck since a multitude of bugs can be (and most often, are) found when QA analysts start looking at previously untested software. In order to meet deadlines, testing phases may be shortened or eliminated altogether, resulting in increased numbers of potentially severe issues at worst, or increased customer support workload at best. Utilizing Agile development practices can alleviate these problems by integrating testing throughout the development process, allowing for a higher quality application.

Agile processes can seem chaotic or time-consuming at first, especially if the team is unfamiliar with or still adapting to the shift in thinking required. Whereas traditional development cycles will have a definite start and end, Agile projects are often treated as a continuous endeavor made up of iterations, or sprints, which often last around two weeks. Team members decide on what issues or functionality they will deal with in each iteration, and once that sprint is finished, the next one begins. Testing is not performed in only one phase of the process, but is integrated into each phase to varying degrees, starting as soon as code is created. Members of an Agile team are often expected to utilize different skills, so it is not unheard of for developers, stakeholders, and other roles to perform some types of testing duties along with the QA team.

Testers should be well-versed in a variety of testing tools and techniques. Commonly, testing will be exploratory in nature, but understanding how to perform acceptance, UX, load/performance, and even unit testing can be beneficial in an Agile project. Since regression tests can become burdensome over time, many teams implement some form of automated testing. In order to decide whether to add automated tests to a project, team members should weigh the time spent on regression testing against the time that will be spent maintaining the automated test scripts, which can become a problem if the system changes too much, too frequently.

Agile processes are not flawless. Acceptance criteria can change unexpectedly based on stakeholder feedback, and a lack of documentation can create knowledge gaps for the team. Luckily, these types of problems can be avoided if Agile methodologies are properly used. Continuous communication between team members, along with having everyone as involved as possible in each step of the process, can reduce communication issues and help the team to be more adaptable to any changes that can come up. Understanding the nuts and bolts of a system or application and how it should behave under certain conditions is essential to any testing efforts, and with the continuous testing integration that Agile methodologies provide, that type of understanding can be achieved with relative ease.

Related Blogs
See All Blogs
Abstract tech image
Blog
Apr 15, 2025

Analysis Paralysis in AI Adoption

Learn why endless discussions and the relentless pursuit of flawless data are actually costing you valuable time, insights, and competitive advantage – just like it did for giants like Kodak and Blockbuster.

Read More
Product team at a meeting
Blog
Apr 4, 2025

Don’t Take Product Out of the Equation: How to Nail Your AI Implementation

AI isn't just about the technology, it's about solving real problems and delivering real value. One way to do that is to keep product at the forefront during your AI implementation. Learn more about why having a product-first mindset is so important in this article by Principal Product Strategist Heather Harris.

Read More
Female financial analyst at a computer
Blog
Apr 3, 2025

Navigating AI in Banking and Financial Services: A Risk-Based Rebellion for Leaders

Every shiny AI use case in regulated industries has a shadow: governance, compliance, model risk, ethics, bias, explainability, cyberattack vectors and more. It's not that organizations and leaders don’t want AI, it’s that they’re paralyzed by the political, regulatory, and operational realities of deploying it. Sparq's Chief Technology Officer Derek Perry and VP, BFSI Industry Leader Rob Murray argue we need to change that. Check out this article to learn how to actually ship production AI use cases in regulated environments.

Read More
Product development team working
Blog
Apr 2, 2025

Five Important Questions to Ask Before Starting Your AI Implementation

Creating a lasting impact with AI requires more than just technical output. In this article by Principal Product Strategist Heather Harris, learn five questions to ask before starting an AI implementation so it can deliver long-term business value.

Read More
See All Blogs
noun-arrow-2025160 copy 2
noun-arrow-2025160 copy 2
See All Blogs