Balancing Technical Debt and New Features: A Product Owner’s Guide

The term “technical debt” frequently emerges in discussions about software development, product health and organizational effectiveness. Yet, its true meaning, implications and the balance organizations must find between managing this debt and innovating with new features can often be confusing. This article delves into how to manage that delicate balance so you can create an exceptional product.

Understanding Technical Debt

At its core, technical debt results from the collective compromises made during software development—choices that work but aren’t ideal. These compromises can stem from various factors:

  • Rushed Development: To meet pressing deadlines, developers might sidestep best practices, leading to less than ideal code.
  • Knowledge Gaps: At times, a team might lack the necessary expertise to devise the most effective solution.
  • Shifting Requirements: As a product evolves its needs can shift, rendering some existing code obsolete or misaligned.
  • Legacy Constraints: Outdated technologies or systems can accrue debt if they’re not aligned with modern, streamlined methods and approaches.

Implications for Product Development and Long-term Health

Technical debt can have far-reaching consequences:

  • Stunted Development: As technical debt mounts, integrating new features or making changes without disrupting existing functions becomes increasingly difficult.
  • Elevated Costs: Rectifying problems stemming from technical debt can be expensive, encompassing debugging, rework and in some instances, necessitating an entire system revamp.
  • Diminished Performance: The weight of technical debt can directly impede software performance, causing lags, system crashes and other unwelcome issues.
  • Team Morale and Productivity: Continuously dealing with the fallout of prior choices can greatly affect development teams’ outlook. This can result in dwindling productivity and heightened staff turnover.
  • Security Vulnerabilities: Areas within the system burdened by significant technical debt may expose security weak points due to antiquated technologies or missed vulnerabilities.

Approaches to Evaluate and Rank Technical Debt

It’s important to prioritize the technical debt that must be addressed immediately and prioritized over new features, versus that which can be fixed over time. As a product owner, here are some things to consider:

  • Routine Debt Reviews: Initiate regular assessments to gauge the extent and ramifications of your technical debt.
  • Classify Debt: Technical debt varies in severity. Distinguishing between minor and critical debts helps with setting priorities.
  • Document Debt in Backlog: Ensure visibility of technical debt by incorporating it into your product backlog, preventing it from being overshadowed by new features.

Balancing Technical Improvements with New Feature Development

Balancing the fixing of technical debt with the rollout of new features is a delicate equilibrium many organizations must deal with. Here are a few reasons finding this balance can be so tricky:

  • The Lure of Immediate vs. Long-term Benefits: New features typically yield instant advantages, both in functionality and potential revenue. Addressing technical debt, on the other hand, ensures product longevity and more efficient operations down the line.
  • Satisfying Stakeholder Expectations: Developers often advocate for dedicating resources to mitigate technical debt to make things more efficient. In contrast, business stakeholders who often hold the keys to the budget may lean towards features that yield quick returns.
  • The Reality of Resource Limitations: Given that most organizations operate within resource constraints, directing resources toward code refactoring may necessitate a slowdown in new development.

Before proceeding with any new feature development, you’ll want to scrutinize any technical debt issues within the product backlog:

  • The Underlying Nature of the Debt: Does it pertain to the codebase, architectural choices or obsolete technologies?
  • Evaluate its Gravity: Is it a potential catalyst for system breakdowns or simply a minor hitch?
  • Estimate the Rectification Effort: Would a full development cycle be required? Or is a short-term fix feasible?
  • Acknowledge Dependencies: Would rectifying a specific debt streamline the development of imminent features?
  • Gauge User Impact: Would debt resolution notably refine the user experience?

To help find the right balance between addressing technical debt versus new product development, here are some strategies to consider in the course of product management:

  • Routine Debt Reviews: Periodically evaluate and prioritize technical debt to formulate a strategy that tackles the most pressing issues first.
  • Set Aside Dedicated Time: Some organizations earmark a certain portion of their development cycles specifically to address technical debt.
  • Gradual Refactoring: Instead of extensive overhauls, think about refining code progressively, blending these enhancements with regular feature updates.
  • Inform Stakeholders: Ensure every stakeholder, even those without a technical background, grasps the ramifications of technical debt, fostering better decision-making.

Technical debt accrues over time and can greatly influence the effectiveness of software applications. Even though it’s commonly found in software creation, the objective shouldn’t be to completely get rid of technical debt, but instead, to manage it effectively. By doing so, organizations can enhance the resilience of their offerings.

Simultaneously, it’s important to ensure that the emphasis on technical debt doesn’t eclipse the urgency of introducing new features. Both components are imperative for product enhancement and user satisfaction. Proper management involves finding an equilibrium: reserve specific periods within development phases for technical debt improvement, while simultaneously keeping momentum in launching innovative, value-driven functionalities to address user preferences and product health. Taking this balanced approach ensures that a product remains technically adept while consistently adapting to the dynamic requirements of its audience.

About the Author:

Sean Ewing is a seasoned Product Manager with a passion for fostering a product-centric culture and believes in the power of a robust product mindset to transform businesses and delight users. Apart from shaping products, he is frequently found on a bicycle in the great outdoors.

Related Blogs
See All Blogs
Apr 29, 2024

Why Aligning Product Vision with Organizational Vision is Critical

For those in the tech industry, a company's vision isn't merely a checkbox; it's the propelling force steering your organization forward. But does your product vision align and drive your product and engineering teams? In this article, Senior Product Strategist Heather Harris shares five ways not having alignment between your product vision and organizational goals can impact your entire company.

Read More
Apr 4, 2024

Four Ways a Strong Customer Experience (CX) Strategy Can Benefit Your Entire Business

Creating a positive customer experience (CX) is typically an important part of a company’s product strategy, but many people don’t realize the far-reaching impact of CX on the overall business. In this article, Senior Principal Consultant Joe Dallacqua and Principal Product Strategist Ryan Finco delve into the elements of a strong CX and how they can benefit your entire business.

Read More
Mar 18, 2024

Unlocking Gen AI’s Full Potential: The Crucial Role of Quality Data

In an era where artificial intelligence (AI) promises to revolutionize industries and redefine competitive landscapes, generative AI stands out for its ability to create new content, from text to images, videos and beyond. This article explores the pivotal role of high-quality data in generative AI efficacy, examines the preparedness of companies for adopting these technologies and outlines essential steps for building a robust data foundation.

Read More
Mar 13, 2024

Navigating Readiness & Expense for Section 1071 Compliance

After 14 years, Section 1071 of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) moved from the back burner in bank lending under the Dodd-Frank Act. The question about 1071 remains: will it come onto the front burner considering the legal challenges and injunctions that have delayed its implementation for years? We believe that there are many areas to consider as a bank assesses their compliance readiness, which should be driving discussions across these executive responsibilities. Read on for key readiness focus areas and questions for discussion.

Read More
See All Blogs
noun-arrow-2025160 copy 2
noun-arrow-2025160 copy 2
See All Blogs